o Request Information
REQUEST INFORMATION

REQUEST INFORMATION

Please fill out this form and submit it to request more information

On February 1, Professors Andrew Knapp and Jennifer Koh spoke at a symposium organized by the Southwestern Law Review on “Immigration in the Trump Era.” Both participated in a panel entitled, “Dimaya and the Crimmigration of Migration.” Professor Knapp shared about his representation of James Dimaya, whose case he took from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court, and for whom he and the rest of the legal team prevailed in Sessions v. Dimaya (invalidating a portion of the “crime of violence” definition in immigration law under the void for vagueness doctrine), https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lynch-v-dimaya/. Professor Koh’s comments focused on the void for vagueness doctrine and immigration enforcement, which arose from her law review article, “Crimmigration and the Void for Vagueness Doctrine,” which appeared in a 2017 issue of the Wisconsin Law Review (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2846572) as well as a forthcoming essay that will soon appear in the Stanford Law Review Online.